Hassett Still Blaming Biden For Trump's Rotten Economy
Emotional Spotlighting
How They Deceive You
Propaganda
Loaded language and a factual error on cumulative vs. peak inflation distort the critique into heavy spin.
Main Device
Emotional Spotlighting
Title and lede weaponize terms like 'Rotten Economy' and 'lied' to frame the subject negatively.
Archetype
Biden economic defender
Positions the Biden record as superior while attacking Trump-era advisors with selective claims.
Uses loaded headline language and misstates inflation data to paint Hassett as dishonest rather than engage the numbers.
Writer's Worldview
“Biden economic defender”
3 findings
What is your news hiding from you?
Same analysis. Any article. Completely free.
Narrative Analysis
The article identifies a clear tension between polling data and official economic indicators but undermines its own credibility through a factual distortion on inflation metrics and loaded framing.
Key Findings
- Factual distortion on inflation data: The article states that Hassett "lied" by citing a "combined inflation rate" of 20% under Biden, claiming inflation "actually peaked at around 9%, not 20%." This treats the peak annual rate (9.1% in 2022) as the only valid measure while ignoring the cumulative price-level increase of roughly 19-20% from 2021 through 2024, which aligns with the phrasing Hassett used ("we had 20% inflation under Joe Biden").
- Loaded language in headline and lede: The title "Hassett Still Blaming Biden For Trump's Rotten Economy" and opening sentence directly label the economy "rotten" and accuse Hassett of lying. These choices establish a negative frame before presenting any quotes or data.
- Unsupported assertion on recovery: The article claims Biden "managed to get us back on track better than most of the rest of the world" without citing comparative GDP, employment, or inflation figures from peer economies.
What Was Missing
The article provides no data on cumulative price changes versus peak rates, which would have allowed readers to evaluate whether Hassett's 20% figure referred to total erosion in purchasing power rather than a single year's rate. It also omits the specific Michigan survey breakdowns Hassett referenced, leaving the polling critique unexamined.
Source and Author Context
The piece appears on Crooksandliars.com with a byline of "Heather." No additional biographical or prior reporting details are supplied in the available text.
Bottom Line
The article correctly flags the gap between public sentiment in polls and administration claims of strong growth, yet it weakens that point by mischaracterizing a verifiable distinction in inflation measurement and relying on evaluative language rather than additional data. This approach prioritizes framing over precision on the central economic claim.
Neutral Rewrite
Here's how this article reads with loaded language removed and missing context included.
White House Advisor Discusses Polling Data, Inflation Trends, and Economic Indicators
White House economic advisor Kevin Hassett appeared on Fox News’ The Sunday Briefing to address recent surveys showing low public approval of economic conditions. Host Peter Doocy cited figures indicating that 23 percent of voters rated the economy as excellent or good, 12 percent described their personal finances as improving, and 62 percent viewed grocery prices as a major household concern.
Hassett responded that many surveys include disproportionate numbers of Democratic respondents, which he said skews results. He pointed to the University of Michigan consumer sentiment survey, noting that Democratic participants rated conditions as the worst since the Great Depression while Republican respondents described stronger growth and lower inflation. Hassett cited third-quarter GDP growth projected at 5 percent, a recent jobs report, real income gains, and the largest annual decline in prescription drug prices in 64 years. He also referenced initial unemployment claims at the lowest levels recorded since World War II.
Doocy asked whether Hassett would acknowledge that many people continue to feel prices remain elevated. Hassett replied that cumulative inflation during the prior administration reached approximately 20 percent, producing higher price levels that have persisted even as recent annualized inflation has approached the Federal Reserve’s 2 percent target. He noted that the year-over-year inflation rate peaked at 9.1 percent in June 2022 before declining. Hassett added that he had observed recent price reductions on items such as ground beef at retail outlets.
Bureau of Labor Statistics data confirm that the Consumer Price Index rose by roughly 19–20 percent on a cumulative basis between January 2021 and January 2025. The same series shows the peak 12-month rate of 9.1 percent occurred in mid-2022, after which the rate moderated. Separate Commerce Department figures placed annualized GDP growth in the third quarter of the current year near 5 percent in initial estimates, while Labor Department data showed initial unemployment claims near historic lows.
Hassett also discussed recent Federal Reserve policy actions and administration efforts to reduce regulatory requirements, including changes affecting appliance standards. He stated these steps were intended to lower operating costs for businesses such as trucking. Doocy noted additional market indicators, including record levels on major stock indexes.
The exchange occurred against a backdrop of differing economic records across administrations. The Biden administration took office during the final stages of pandemic-related disruptions that had produced sharp swings in employment and output. Official data show unemployment falling from above 6 percent in early 2021 to around 3.7 percent by late 2023, with cumulative job gains exceeding 15 million positions before the subsequent transition. Inflation rose rapidly in 2021–2022 amid supply-chain constraints and fiscal measures, then eased after 2022. The current administration has reported continued GDP expansion, low initial claims for unemployment insurance, and further reductions in certain regulated costs, while cumulative price levels remain above those recorded at the start of 2021.
Hassett maintained that pocketbook measures—employment stability, income growth, and recent price movements—provide a clearer picture than survey responses. Doocy pressed on whether visible price levels affect daily perceptions regardless of recent inflation trends. The discussion concluded without resolution on that point, with both participants agreeing that drug-price reductions and stock-market performance represented positive developments while differing on the weight to assign to polling results.
Additional government statistics released in recent months include continued expansion in real disposable income and further moderation in core inflation measures excluding food and energy. Federal Reserve projections at the time of the interview placed the policy rate path dependent on incoming data for employment and prices.
Investigation Log · 24 steps
Starting investigation...
Investigating Crooks and Liars
Investigating Heather Crooks and Liars
Searching for "US inflation rate peak under Biden administration"
Verify Hassett's claim of 20% inflation vs article's 9%
Searching for "US CPI inflation rate 2021-2024 peak value"
Confirm actual peak inflation under Biden
Searching for ""Kevin Hassett" "20% inflation" Biden"
Context of the quote and accuracy
Factual Error
Article claims Hassett "lied" about inflation rate under Biden by citing "combined inflation rate" of 20%, asserting it "actually peaked at around 9%, not 20%".
This misrepresents the common distinction between peak annual rate (9.1%) and cumulative price increases (~19-20% from 2021-2024), making Hassett's statement appear false when it refers to total price level change.
Emotional Manipulation
Title and lede use loaded terms like "Trump's Rotten Economy" and "lied" to frame the story.
Creates immediate negative impression of both Hassett and the economy without neutral presentation.
Omission
Article asserts Biden "managed to get us back on track better than most of the rest of the world" without data or comparison.
Presents contested economic recovery narrative as undisputed fact.
Writing analysis narrative
Writing verdict summary
Writing neutral rewrite
Investigation complete. Preparing report...
Analysis narrative ready
Neutral rewrite ready
**Investigation complete.** The article from Crooks and Liars distorts the inflation discussion by treating Hassett's reference to cumulative price increases (~20%) as a lie when it differs from the peak year-over-year rate (9.1%). Loaded framing ("Trump's Rotten Economy," "lied") and an unsupported assertion about Biden's recovery performance compound the issue. Verdict: D (propaganda grade). Main device: Emotional Spotlighting. Archetype: Biden economic defender.
The Compass
You see how this outlet sees the world.
How do you see it? Find your political shape in a few minutes.
Take the testOr check your own article