All Reports

Wisconsin Town Goes To Polls Today To Hobble Future Data Centers

crooksandliars.comApril 7, 2026 at 03:49 PM10 views
D

Sarcastic Mockery

How They Deceive You

Propaganda

D

The article heavily misleads through sarcastic loaded language, factual errors on project scale, unverified claims, and omissions of economic benefits and local approvals.

Main Device

Sarcastic Mockery

It uses mocking sarcasm like 'broligarchy's AI Ponzi scheme' and 'Don't threaten me with a good time, Brad!' to ridicule industry concerns and celebrate anti-data center activism.

Archetype

Left-populist anti-Big Tech agitator

The hyperpartisan progressive blog and author frame the referendum as a grassroots win against Trump-backed 'hulking AI factories' and corporate overreach.

This article deceives readers by mixing facts with sarcasm, factual errors, and omissions of jobs and approvals to hype an anti-tech populist narrative.

Writer's Worldview

Anti-Tech Populista

Left-populist anti-Big Tech agitator

8 findings · 3 omissions · 4 sources compared

Full report locked

See what they don't want you to see

In this report

The full propaganda playbook

Every manipulation tactic, named and explained

What they left out

Missing context with sources to verify

How other outlets covered it

Side-by-side framing comparisons

The article without spin

A neutral rewrite you can compare

Plus: check any URL yourself

Paste any article, tweet, or Reddit thread and get the same investigation. Unlimited.

Get Full Access — $4.99/mo

Cancel anytime · Instant access after checkout

What is your news hiding from you?

Same analysis. Any article. $4.99/mo.

Narrative Analysis

Verdict: This Crooks and Liars article mixes factual reporting on a Port Washington, Wisconsin referendum with heavy sarcasm and opinionated framing, understating the data center project's scale while omitting key economic details and local pushback, which amplifies an anti-tech narrative over balanced analysis.

Key Techniques and Evidence

The piece employs sarcastic asides and loaded phrasing to editorialize:

  • Terms like "kneecap data center development", "hulking artificial intelligence factories", and "broligarchy's AI Ponzi scheme" cast industry opposition in a mocking light.

"Oh darn. You mean the local pollution and rising utility costs... Don't threaten me with a good time, Brad!"

  • This follows a quote from Data Center Coalition's Brad Tietz, an industry advocate with a pro-development background (e.g., led Illinois data center incentives), dismissing his economic and security concerns without rebuttal.

Factual inaccuracies undermine credibility:

  • Describes the project as "1.3-gigawatt", but sources like Milwaukee Journal Sentinel and Ozaukee Press report up to 3.5 GW power demand—understating scale amid utility cost debates.
  • Claims the vote is "the first time any U.S. municipality will go to the ballot to kneecap data center development", unverified by searches; Politico notes at least four similar measures nationwide this year.

Framing choices prioritize drama:

  • Leads with town "upended by a data center backed by Trump", implying victimhood without evidence of disruption; local outlets describe council-approved incentives.

The article does note the referendum targets future projects (requiring voter approval for TIF incentives over certain thresholds) and won't derail the current $15B Vantage campus for OpenAI/Oracle—accurate on those points.

Critical Omissions of Verifiable Facts

These gaps alter reader understanding of tradeoffs:

  • City council approved a $459M TIF for public improvements tied to this Vantage project (FOX6 Milwaukee, Ozaukee Press)—contextualizes the referendum as forward-looking, not a block on the immediate development.
  • Metropolitan Milwaukee Association of Commerce sued to challenge referendum validity (FOX6)—shows business opposition and legal risks, beyond grassroots momentum.
  • Expected jobs: Thousands in construction, ~1,000 permanent (Wisconsin Public Radio, TMJ4)—omitted despite article's sarcasm on "pollution and rising utility costs", for which no project-specific evidence appears.
  • No mention of developer Vantage Data Centers; focuses on "OpenAI and Oracle" and "Big Tech" for broader villainy.

No evidence found for implied local harms like pollution or utility spikes tied to this site.

Source and Author Context

  • Crooks and Liars: Progressive blog known for partisan critiques of Republicans and conservatives.
  • Susie Madrak: Frequent contributor with left-populist, anti-Republican pieces; this reads as opinion despite news-like format.
  • Tietz quote: Transparent industry voice, but sarcasm neutralizes it without counter-facts.

Coverage Comparison

Other outlets provide more neutral, detailed takes:

  • Politico emphasizes national "revolt" against Trump/AI boom, noting multiple ballot measures—opposition-focused like this piece, but omits TIF/legal details.
  • FOX6 Milwaukee sticks to local facts: $15B project, $459M TIF approval, MMAC lawsuit—balanced dispute without sarcasm.
  • WUWM (NPR) offers procedural explainer on TIFs—purely informational, no framing.
  • Ozaukee Press quotes both sides, specifies $10M thresholds and Great Lakes Neighbors United group—most comprehensive local view.

Bottom Line

Strengths: Highlights a rare voter-driven referendum on tech incentives, correctly notes its limited scope, and surfaces industry concerns via quote. Weaknesses: Sarcasm, errors (e.g., power capacity), and omissions (jobs, lawsuit, TIF approval) make it more advocacy than journalism, potentially misleading on a nuanced economic debate. Solid local reporting elsewhere fills the gaps effectively.

Further Reading

Full report locked

See what they don't want you to see

In this report

The full propaganda playbook

Every manipulation tactic, named and explained

What they left out

Missing context with sources to verify

How other outlets covered it

Side-by-side framing comparisons

The article without spin

A neutral rewrite you can compare

Plus: check any URL yourself

Paste any article, tweet, or Reddit thread and get the same investigation. Unlimited.

Get Full Access — $4.99/mo

Cancel anytime · Instant access after checkout

Already subscribed? Log in

Now check your news

You just saw what we found in this article. Paste any URL and get the same analysis — the propaganda, the missing context, and the spin.

$4.99/mo · 100 analyses