MAGA Election Fraud Activist Found Guilty of Election Fraud
Trojan Horse Framing
How They Deceive You
Propaganda
Heavily misleading through ironic hypocrisy framing, key omissions of context and parallels, and pivoting to unrelated anti-GOP attacks despite accurate core facts.
Main Device
Trojan Horse Framing
Uses Harry Wait's conviction as a hook to embed unrelated 'MAGA failures' list, disguising partisan commentary as straight news.
Archetype
Anti-MAGA progressive partisan
Exemplifies New Republic-style left-leaning snark targeting Trump Republicans with selective outrage over election integrity efforts.
This article deceives readers by weaponizing a local conviction's irony to smear MAGA via omissions, snark, and unrelated GOP hit list.
Writer's Worldview
“Anti-Trump Satirist”
Anti-MAGA progressive partisan
6 findings · 2 omissions · 4 sources compared
Full report locked
See what they don't want you to see
In this report
The full propaganda playbook
Every manipulation tactic, named and explained
What they left out
Missing context with sources to verify
How other outlets covered it
Side-by-side framing comparisons
The article without spin
A neutral rewrite you can compare
Plus: check any URL yourself
Paste any article, tweet, or Reddit thread and get the same investigation. Unlimited.
Cancel anytime · Instant access after checkout
What is your news hiding from you?
Same analysis. Any article. $4.99/mo.
Narrative Analysis
Verdict: This New Republic post delivers the core facts of Harry Wait's conviction accurately but employs ironic framing and selective omissions to amplify hypocrisy against MAGA activists, then pivots to unrelated GOP critiques—turning a straightforward local case into partisan commentary.
Core Strengths
The article correctly reports verifiable details:
- Wait, 71, convicted Tuesday in Racine County on two misdemeanor election fraud charges and one felony identity theft.
- He requested absentee ballots in 2022 using identities of Assembly Speaker Robin Vos (R) and Mayor Cory Mason (D).
- Leads H.O.T Government, which claims widespread election fraud and 2020 Trump win in Wisconsin (actual margin: Trump lost by 20,881 votes).
"In a failed attempt to prevent voter fraud, a Wisconsin man was convicted of … voter fraud."
This lede hooks effectively, though the ellipsis adds sarcasm.
Key Techniques and Findings
- Ironic labeling in title and framing: "MAGA Election Fraud Activist Found Guilty of Election Fraud" implies hypocrisy without noting Wait's admitted intent to test vulnerabilities—he publicly disclosed the ballots to Associated Press immediately, held them up in a video, and never used them.
- Evidence: Wait told AP he acted "to try to prove that the state’s voter registration system is vulnerable to fraud"; acquitted on one count, plans appeal (ABC News, WaPo).
- Omission of Republican support: No mention of praise from Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI), who in 2022 called Wait a "white hat hacker," or Racine Sheriff Christoper Schmaling, who said it highlighted system issues.
- Why it matters: Isolates Wait as a lone fraudster, downplaying how some Republicans viewed his act as exposing flaws (Wisconsin Examiner, ABC).
- Trojan Horse structure: Uses Wait's case as a hook to list unrelated GOP issues (SAVE Act impacts, shutdown threats, TSA lines, fertilizer prices, Trump appointments).
- Evidence: Article shifts abruptly: "His conviction comes as Trump and the GOP desperately try to pass the SAVE Act..." No links shown between local conviction and national policy.
- Sarcastic tone in hybrids: Phrases like "supposedly prevent voter fraud (which is exceedingly rare), but in reality would disenfranchise millions" blend fact with editorial without sourcing the "millions" claim.
Verifiable Omissions That Matter
These concrete facts alter the story's implications:
- Wait publicized his actions right away—no ballots cast or misused (WPR, multiple outlets).
- Near-identical Democratic case: In 2024, Milwaukee clerk Kimberly Zapata (D) convicted of misconduct for requesting three absentee ballots with fake names/SSNs to expose vulnerabilities; sentenced to one year probation, $3,000 fine (Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, ABC News).
- Provides symmetry: Both sides have officials/activists testing systems similarly, with light consequences.
No major right-leaning coverage (e.g., Fox, Breitbart), suggesting limited GOP defense.
Author and Outlet Context
- Marin Scotten: Freelance journalist focused on environment/climate (Guardian, Sierra Club magazine, Salon). Has critiqued Trump, Musk, House Republicans in past pieces; no noted election expertise.
- The New Republic: Left-leaning (AllSides), often critical of conservatives. Post format mixes reporting with opinion.
Coverage Comparison
Other outlets vary in emphasis:
- Neutral, fact-focused: WPR sticks to trial (jury deliberation, supporters present, no-remorse quote), omits irony or 2020 ties.
- Ironic/critical: NBC, WaPo highlight hypocrisy, link to 2020 claims; NBC calls group claims "false."
- Loaded left: Wisconsin Examiner uses "election denier," notes GOP praise but rebuts with official defenses.
Bottom line: Solid on conviction basics—credit for timeliness—but weakens via omissions (praise, disclosure, Dem parallel) and pivot to unrelated gripes, prioritizing narrative over full context. Readers get a skewed "MAGA fail" without balance, though not outright fabrication.
Further Reading
- Wisconsin Public Radio: Harry Wait convicted of election fraud for absentee ballots sent to Vos, Mason
- NBC News: Activist who pushed 2020 election fraud claims convicted of election fraud
- Washington Post: Activist who requested mail ballots to expose voter fraud convicted of fraud
- Wisconsin Examiner: Racine Co. election denier found guilty in voter fraud case
*(Word count: 612)*
Full report locked
See what they don't want you to see
In this report
The full propaganda playbook
Every manipulation tactic, named and explained
What they left out
Missing context with sources to verify
How other outlets covered it
Side-by-side framing comparisons
The article without spin
A neutral rewrite you can compare
Plus: check any URL yourself
Paste any article, tweet, or Reddit thread and get the same investigation. Unlimited.
Now check your news
You just saw what we found in this article. Paste any URL and get the same analysis — the propaganda, the missing context, and the spin.
$4.99/mo · 100 analyses