This Data Center Is Everything That Everyone Hates About AI

Stratos Data Center Project Draws Environmental Concerns and Legal Challenges in Utah

The Stratos Project was proposed in March 2026 as a hyperscale data center in Box Elder County, Utah. Plans called for a facility exceeding 2.5 times the size of Manhattan, with power consumption projected to surpass twice the state’s average electricity demand and supplied in part through a dedicated natural gas connection. Project materials described intended uses including training of large AI models, support for advanced manufacturing, and defense-related computing tasks.

Utah State University professor Robert Davies produced calculations estimating that waste heat from the completed facility could raise local daytime temperatures by five degrees Fahrenheit and nighttime temperatures by 28 degrees Fahrenheit, describing the energy release as equivalent to 23 atom bombs. Brigham Young University ecology professor Ben Abbott stated that such temperature increases could alter the local semiarid environment toward conditions resembling desert regions. Additional concerns centered on water consumption in an area already experiencing drought conditions. These statements were presented during public discussion of the proposal.

The Box Elder County Commission approved the project in May 2026. The review occurred through the Utah Military Installation Development Authority, a state entity established to support military-related development. Use of this authority allowed the project to proceed under expedited procedures that bypassed standard county zoning requirements and extended public review periods that would otherwise apply. Project documentation referenced potential benefits for military AI applications and cybersecurity infrastructure.

Kevin O’Leary, an investor known for his role on the television program Shark Tank, is the primary backer. O’Leary stated that the project would generate 2,000 permanent jobs. No tenant had been secured at the time of approval, and historical data on data center employment indicate that actual permanent staffing levels at similar facilities have often been lower than initial projections.

Local opposition continued after approval. On May 29, 2026, Governor Spencer Cox issued an executive order directing state agencies to evaluate data center proposals with attention to environmental and resource impacts. The order did not name the Stratos Project specifically. In early June 2026, O’Leary announced a reduction in the proposed footprint from 40,000 acres to slightly more than 20,000 acres. Cox stated at a press conference that residents had expressed concerns regarding data centers, water resources, and overall resource use.

On June 23, 2026, Utah Senate President J. Stuart Adams, who had chaired the state agency involved in the initial approval, lost a primary election to a challenger who had criticized support for the project. Two lawsuits were filed against the project in June 2026. One challenges the constitutionality of the Military Installation Development Authority’s use in this context; the second addresses permitting procedures. Both actions are expected to extend the timeline for any construction.

Industry-wide data indicate that many planned data center projects have encountered delays. A JPMorgan analysis found that more than 60 percent of data center capacity scheduled for 2027 was not yet under construction as of mid-2026. Data Center Watch reported that over $130 billion in projects were delayed or canceled in the first quarter of 2026. A May 2026 analysis from the law firm Ropes & Gray noted that permitting challenges and local resistance have become factors affecting project timelines.

Several states have enacted or considered measures addressing data center development. Maine passed a bipartisan moratorium on new data centers in April 2026, though it was initially vetoed; further consideration is possible after the November 2026 elections. Ohio enacted requirements that data center operators cover certain grid-related costs. California passed legislation requiring disclosure of electricity consumption by data center operators. Utah’s executive order directs agencies to balance environmental protection with economic development goals.

Some technology companies have announced voluntary measures. Microsoft introduced a “Community-First” framework in January 2026 after canceling a proposed facility in Wisconsin. The framework includes commitments to cover incremental grid and electricity costs, address local water use, and pay standard property taxes. OpenAI has advocated for increased investment in renewable energy sources to support grid modernization. Anthropic has stated it will cover certain grid infrastructure and electricity cost increases associated with facilities it utilizes.

Federal policy has moved in a different direction. A July 2025 executive order from the Trump administration directed agencies to reduce regulatory requirements for data centers with capital costs of at least $500 million, shorten review periods, and streamline environmental assessments. The order did not address water consumption or local community input processes.

Data centers remain a mobile industry, allowing developers to select jurisdictions based on regulatory conditions. At the same time, state-level actions in Utah, Ohio, California, and Maine demonstrate ongoing regulatory responses at the sub-federal level. The Stratos Project continues under the scaled-back proposal while litigation proceeds on the authority used for its initial review.