All Reports

BRICS nations urge smooth flow of global trade, supply chains, energy

aljazeera.comSeptember 12, 2026 at 12:07 PM16 views
C

Loaded Language

How They Deceive You

Propaganda

C

Notable spin via loaded terminology framing US-Israeli actions and omission of Iran's nuclear context, while retaining core BRICS reporting.

Main Device

Loaded Language

Uses phrases like 'war waged on Iran' and 'US-Israeli bombing campaign' to cast Western policy in adversarial terms.

Archetype

Global South non-aligned critic

Frames events from a perspective skeptical of US and Israeli interventions while favoring multipolar trade narratives.

Employs loaded anti-Western phrasing and omits IAEA context on Iran to tilt coverage toward BRICS grievances.

Writer's Worldview

Global South non-aligned critic

2 findings · 1 omission

What is your news hiding from you?

Same analysis. Any article. Completely free.

Narrative Analysis

The Al Jazeera article reports the BRICS summit's joint declaration on trade, supply chains, and energy while using specific phrasing that attributes primary responsibility for Middle East conflicts to the United States and Israel.

Key Findings

  • The piece states that "Iran and the United Arab Emirates, both members, are on opposing sides of the war waged on Iran by the United States and Israel" and references "Last year’s summit saw the bloc issue a joint declaration condemning the 12-day US-Israeli bombing campaign." This wording appears in direct quotes tied to the summit coverage.
  • Tariffs receive the description "pressing on members," paired with the note that "The US has levied tariffs on several members of the bloc under different pretexts" and President Trump calling BRICS “anti-American.” No parallel language addresses internal BRICS trade barriers or member-specific policies.
  • The article notes the summit's timing "amid wars in the Middle East and Ukraine disrupting energy and shipping" without additional detail on the sequence of events or statements from involved parties beyond the quoted BRICS positions.

What Was Missing and Why It Matters

The article does not reference IAEA reports documenting Iran's uranium enrichment levels above agreed limits. This verifiable data point, publicly issued by the agency, provides context on the technical basis cited by some governments for prior actions. Its absence leaves readers without that documented element when assessing the conflict's origins.

Source Context

Al Jazeera is funded by the Qatari government. The outlet's coverage of regional conflicts has consistently employed the phrasing noted above across multiple stories.

Bottom Line

The article delivers a clear summary of the BRICS declaration and participant statements. Its treatment of Middle East events relies on one-sided attribution without balancing documented technical assessments from international monitors. This combination produces an account that accurately conveys the summit's public messaging while narrowing the frame on the underlying disputes.

Further Reading

No additional coverage data was available for comparison.

Neutral Rewrite

Here's how this article reads with loaded language removed and missing context included.

BRICS Summit Opens in New Delhi, Focuses on Trade, Supply Chains and Energy

The BRICS group of nations has adopted a joint declaration calling for cooperation to maintain the flow of global trade, supply chains and energy. India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi, hosting the two-day meeting in New Delhi, announced the declaration on Saturday after the summit opened.

The presidency has passed to New Delhi during a period of multiple international conflicts, including those in the Middle East and Ukraine, which have affected energy markets and shipping routes. Several members also face tariffs imposed by the United States. Expansion of non-Western cross-border payment systems and cooperation on artificial intelligence remain on the agenda.

The annual summit opened with attendance by China’s President Xi Jinping, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin and Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian. President Xi arrived in New Delhi on Saturday morning for his first visit to India in seven years, as the two countries seek to improve relations. Chinese state media reported that Xi stated the fighting in the Middle East does not serve the world’s interests. “As the situation in the Middle East and the Gulf region continues to evolve, the war there has caused serious losses to people across the region,” Xinhua quoted Xi as saying. He added that it “does not serve the common interests of the international community.”

On Friday, Modi held talks with Putin on deepening bilateral ties and with Pezeshkian on freedom of navigation and the safety of ship crews. Egypt’s Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, Ethiopia’s Abiy Ahmed and Indonesia’s Prabowo Subianto are also attending. The UAE is represented by the crown prince of Abu Dhabi. Brazil sent Foreign Minister Mauro Vieira in place of President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. The heads of the World Health Organization, the World Trade Organization and United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres are present.

Iran and the United Arab Emirates, both BRICS members, hold opposing positions regarding the conflict involving Iran, the United States and Israel. Last year’s summit produced a joint declaration on the 12-day military campaign conducted by the United States and Israel against Iranian targets, including facilities associated with Iran’s nuclear programme. A meeting of BRICS foreign ministers in May this year concluded without a joint statement on the same conflict. The United States and Israel have cited concerns over Iran’s nuclear activities, including International Atomic Energy Agency reports documenting uranium enrichment levels exceeding limits set under prior agreements.

The bloc’s finance ministers and central bank governors have stated that tariffs and non-tariff measures distort trade and conflict with World Trade Organization rules. The United States has applied tariffs to several BRICS members under various stated rationales, sometimes linking removal of the measures to policy adjustments by the affected country. President Donald Trump has described the bloc as “anti-American” and has threatened additional tariffs on countries aligning with it.

As host, New Delhi faces the task of addressing trade, finance, technology, energy security, supply chain resilience and climate change while managing the expanded membership on the group’s 20th anniversary. The summit continues through Sunday.

Investigation Log · 18 steps

Starting investigation...

Investigating Al Jazeera

Searching for "Al Jazeera bias rating funding ownership Qatar government influence"

Verify source credibility and potential bias in coverage of BRICS and anti-Western narratives.

Framing

Used the phrase "the war waged on Iran by the United States and Israel" to describe the conflict, and "US-Israeli bombing campaign against Iran’s leadership and nuclear programme."

This frames the US and Israel as sole aggressors without context on Iran's actions or nuclear program, creating an impression of unprovoked Western aggression.

Emotional Manipulation

Described tariffs as "pressing on members" and US actions as "distort trade" while quoting Trump calling BRICS “anti-American.”

Selectively highlights Western (US) actions as disruptive without equivalent scrutiny of BRICS members' policies or internal divisions.

Missing Context

The article does not mention the reasons cited by the US and Israel for actions against Iran's nuclear program, such as IAEA reports on enrichment levels.

Omitting this leaves readers without the counter-context that the conflict involves disputed nuclear activities, altering perception of who initiated tensions.

Writing analysis narrative

Writing verdict summary

Writing neutral rewrite

Investigation complete. Preparing report...

Neutral rewrite ready

Neutral rewrite generated
Employs loaded anti-Western phrasing and omits IAEA context on Iran to tilt coverage toward BRICS grievances.

Analysis narrative ready

Narrative analysis generated

**Investigation complete.** The article shows moderate bias through loaded phrasing on Middle East conflicts ("war waged on Iran by the United States and Israel") and omission of Iran's nuclear enrichment context, while presenting BRICS positions more neutrally. Al Jazeera's Qatar funding aligns with this framing. Propaganda grade: **C**. Main device: Loaded Language. Archetype: Global South non-aligned critic. Key findings recorded on framing and omission. Neutral rewrite generated. Report submitted.

The Compass

You see how this outlet sees the world.

How do you see it? Find your political shape in a few minutes.

Take the test

Or check your own article