Watch: Platner Weighs in on 'Sexting' Story - It's an Absolute Trainwreck

Maine Senate Candidate Graham Platner Addresses Reports on Past Communications During Media Interview

Maine Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner participated in a media interview on May 31, 2026, alongside his wife, Amy Gertner, in which he criticized coverage by national outlets of allegations involving past messages. Platner described the reporting as focused on private matters rather than policy issues such as hospital closures, childcare access, and compensation for teachers and nurses.

Platner stated that establishment media outlets were prioritizing what he called gossip over discussion of economic conditions facing Mainers. He said the outlets were attempting to shift attention away from policy differences in the race. He also described his marriage as loving and happy, adding that he and his wife intended to continue addressing issues including hospital and childcare facility closures and wages for public sector workers.

A reporter asked whether the reported text messages were accurate. Platner responded that The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times had published stories based on statements from a former staffer without possessing the messages themselves. He characterized the reporting as journalistic malpractice and said the campaign had disputed the accounts prior to publication.

When asked directly whether he was confirming that the messages did not exist, Platner said he was disputing the account provided by Genevieve McDonald to The New York Times. He stated that he and his wife had discussed matters related to their marriage with the campaign and that McDonald’s claims were not accurate. In response to a follow-up question about meetings involving uncomfortable messages, Platner said the couple had addressed issues in their marriage through counseling and had discussed those matters internally.

The New York Times had previously reported that McDonald stated Gertner told her Platner had exchanged sexual messages with as many as a dozen women. A current campaign official told the newspaper that the number was up to six women and that the conduct had ended before the campaign began. The official said the messages came to light during an internal vetting process when McDonald asked Gertner if there was anything to disclose. According to the official, Gertner told the campaign the couple had addressed the issue in counseling.

NBC News correspondent Julie Tsirkin reported on May 31 and June 1 that a campaign official confirmed the authenticity of messages reported by The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times that had been exchanged between Gertner and the former aide. The official stated that Platner was not denying the existence of the messages but was instead pointing to the absence of the actual texts in the reporting and to inconsistencies in the accounts. The official described Platner as frustrated by what the campaign viewed as sensationalization of private information provided by a former staffer.

The campaign official further clarified that Platner was not claiming the messages to other women were fabricated. The official indicated the campaign was disputing specific details, including the number of individuals involved, rather than the underlying events.

Platner’s interview occurred amid ongoing coverage of the allegations, which originated from statements by McDonald after she left the campaign. Earlier reporting had included accounts from campaign sources confirming that internal discussions about the messages took place during the vetting process. The campaign has maintained that the couple addressed the matter privately prior to the start of the Senate race.

The interview and subsequent campaign statements addressed questions about the scope of the reporting and the evidence cited by the outlets. Platner emphasized a preference for focusing on state-level policy matters, including access to healthcare and education funding, while the campaign sought to distinguish between confirmation of certain communications and disputes over how those communications were described in published accounts.