All Reports

Experts Have Been Against This Parenting Choice For Decades. So Why Is Markwayne Mullin Bragging About Doing It?

huffpost.comMarch 25, 2026 at 06:08 AM138 views
D

Selective Quoting

How They Deceive You

Propaganda

D

Heavily misleading through factual errors overstating expert consensus against spanking, source stacking anti-spanking advocates, and selective framing emphasizing child distress while omitting positive outcomes and context.

Main Device

Selective Quoting

Truncates Mullin's full anecdote to spotlight the child's pleas of 'No, Daddy! No!' while downplaying immediate post-spanking affection, positive results, and audience applause.

Archetype

Progressive child discipline moralist

Embodies left-leaning cultural advocacy that pathologizes traditional parenting practices like spanking as abusive, aligning with elite expert consensus over parental norms.

This article deceives by selectively framing Mullin's story as bragging about harm, overstating anti-spanking consensus, and omitting legality, prevalence, and scientific debate.

Writer's Worldview

Compassionate Discipline Advocate

Progressive child discipline moralist

6 findings · 4 omissions · 4 sources compared

What is your news hiding from you?

Same analysis. Any article. Completely free.

Narrative Analysis

HuffPost's article resurfaces 2023 comments by DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin on spanking his children, framing them as out-of-step with expert consensus while using selective emphasis on child distress to portray the practice negatively. It accurately transcribes key quotes but overstates scientific unanimity and omits key context on legality and prevalence.

Key Techniques and Evidence

  • Loaded framing via headline and selective quoting: The title calls Mullin's remarks "Bragging About Doing It," implying boastfulness, and dwells on his daughter's pleas ("No, Daddy! No!"). This truncates his full anecdote of post-spanking hugs ("they'll come and crawl on my lap two minutes later and just hug on me") and her positive outcome ("she's a good kid now"), shared to applause from a conservative audience.

"No, Daddy. No, Daddy. No, Daddy! No! I’m sorry, Daddy. I’m sorry, Dad"

  • Overstated expert consensus: Claims "Experts Have Been Against This Parenting Choice For Decades," citing AAP and WHO, presenting opposition as "cut and dry." This implies settled science without noting debate.
  • Evidence: Meta-analyses like Ferguson (2013) report trivial associations (r=0.07-0.11); Larzelere (2024) finds small effects (β=0.08). A 2016 APA survey showed a majority viewed occasional spanking as non-problematic.
  • One-sided sourcing: Quotes only anti-spanking voices (e.g., WHO's Etienne Krug, clinicians Fiona Yassin and Puls) without counter-experts like Larzelere or Ferguson, creating an impression of uniform agreement.

The piece does well in verifying the primary source—Mullin's October 2023 City Elders speech video—and providing direct transcripts, avoiding fabrication.

Verifiable Omissions and Impact

These gaps alter reader perception without contradicting the article's core facts:

  • Legality: Parental spanking remains legal in all 50 U.S. states (per legal summaries from EndCorporalPunishment.org).
  • Prevalence: 37% of U.S. children aged 0-17 experienced it in the past year (2014 UNH Crimes Against Children Research Center survey, n=4,000).
  • Why it matters: Frames a common, protected practice as fringe or aberrant, shifting view from mainstream parenting choice to outlier.

No mention that coverage is limited to left-leaning outlets post-DHS nomination, with zero hits on Fox News or Daily Wire searches.

Author and Source Context

Author unknown; HuffPost has a documented left-leaning bias (e.g., AllSides rates it "Left"), often framing conservative figures critically. Mullin's comments are firsthand from a verifiable public video at a partisan event.

Coverage Differences

Other outlets vary in tone and emphasis:

  • People Magazine (center/mainstream): More neutral, includes full hugs anecdote and Mullin's positive framing as "touting tough parenting," adds Senate context.
  • The Independent (left-UK): Similar "bragging" language, stresses child begging and belt threat, ties to DHS without experts.
  • Hindustan Times (international): Most sensational ("beating children," "'bend over for me'"), amplifies emotional pleas and family details.
  • Daily Beast (left): Downplays spanking details, links to "violent threat" and Christian nationalism concerns.

HuffPost's expert focus stands out, but all lean negative except People.

Bottom line: Strong on sourcing the video and real org positions like AAP's longstanding opposition, making it informative for anti-spanking readers. Weaknesses in consensus portrayal and omissions inflate controversy around a legally common practice, reducing balance on a debated topic.**

Further Reading

*(528 words)*

Investigation Log · 38 steps

Starting investigation...

Investigating HuffPost

Investigating Markwayne Mullin

Searching for "Markwayne Mullin spanking kids exact comments video or transcript"

Verify what Mullin actually said about spanking his children to check if the article accurately represents it as "bragging".

Searching for ""expert consensus" on spanking corporal punishment children harms ineffectiveness"

Verify if there is truly decades-long expert consensus against spanking, or if it's contested, including any dissenting experts or studies.

Comparing coverage of "Markwayne Mullin comments on spanking children"

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) 2018 policy statement, updated in 2023 for schools, opposes all corporal punishment including spanking, citing meta-analyses linking it to increased aggression, antisocial behavior, mental health problems, cognitive impairment, and lower self-esteem; it repor...

Source: HuffPost

Independent media bias raters like Ad Fontes Media score HuffPost as 'Generally Reliable' (38.01/64) and Media Bias/Fact Check rates it 'Mostly Factual' with only one failed fact check in five years, indicating strong factual reporting despite biases. AllSides confirms a high-confidence Left bias with sensationalism in headlines and negative framing of conservatives, but no systemic inaccuracies. Public credibility stands at 35% among U.S. adults per Statista, varying sharply by political affiliation.

Independent media bias raters like Ad Fontes Media score HuffPost as 'Generally Reliable' (38.01/64) and Media Bias/Fact Check rates it 'Mostly Factual' with only one failed fact check in five years, indicating strong factual reporting despite biases. AllSides confirms a high-confidence Left bias wi...
**Markwayne Mullin made comments about spanking his children during a presentation to City Elders, a conservative Christian group, on October 6, 2023.**[[1]](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DM03pbUzl0)[[2]](https://people.com/markwayne-mullin-recalled-kids-spankings-11933498) The full video, title...

Coverage comparison completed

Found 4 outlet comparisons

Source: Markwayne Mullin

Markwayne Mullin, as a former U.S. Senator and current DHS Secretary, offers firsthand personal anecdotes and policy views from public speeches and official roles, verifiable via video and congressional records. His statements lack independent fact-checking ratings and, given partisan events like City Elders, may prioritize audience appeal over neutral analysis, such as defending corporal punishment to conservatives. No documented pattern of fabricated facts exists, but past ethics probes (e.g., unreported income over $600k, ordered to repay $40k) raise transparency concerns.

Markwayne Mullin, as a former U.S. Senator and current DHS Secretary, offers firsthand personal anecdotes and policy views from public speeches and official roles, verifiable via video and congressional records. His statements lack independent fact-checking ratings and, given partisan events like Ci...

Searching for "expert debate on spanking children pro vs con studies consensus"

Find if there's genuine debate or true consensus against spanking; identify pro-spanking experts or studies omitted by article.

Searching for "Markwayne Mullin spanking comments conservative right-leaning coverage Fox News Daily Wire"

Find how right-leaning outlets covered or defended Mullin's comments to compare framing.

Searching for "is spanking legal in US prevalence statistics"

Check for omitted context on legality and commonality of spanking in US.

Searching for "HuffPost article Markwayne Mullin spanking full context experts cited"

Get details on specific experts and claims in the article to verify.

**HuffPost Coverage of Markwayne Mullin's Spanking Remarks:** Two HuffPost articles published March 24-25, 2026, reference a video from an October 2023 meeting with City Elders, a Christian political activist group, where then-Senator Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) discussed his parenting practices.[[1...
**Legality of Parental Spanking in the US** Corporal punishment, including spanking, by parents remains legal in the home in all 50 states and the District of Columbia as of 2024.[[1]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporal_punishment_of_children_in_the_United_States)[[2]](https://endcorporalpunish...
**Summary of Relevant Findings (248 words):** Web searches targeting conservative and right-leaning coverage of Sen. Markwayne Mullin's spanking comments, specifically from Fox News and Daily Wire, produced no matching articles. Site-specific queries for "Markwayne Mullin" combined with "spanking" ...
**Expert Debate on Spanking Children: Key Studies and Findings** Meta-analyses reveal conflicting interpretations. Gershoff and Grogan-Kaylor's 2016 analysis of 75 studies (160,927 children) found spanking linked to 13 detrimental outcomes, mean effect size d=0.33 (95% CI [0.29, 0.38]; p<.001), inc...

Framing

Headline and article frame Mullin's personal anecdote as "bragging" about a harmful practice, using loaded language like "disturbing" and emphasizing child's pleas ("No, Daddy! No!") while downplaying his description of positive post-discipline affection and outcomes.

Creates impression of Mullin as callous or cruel rather than sharing a common parenting view in a sympathetic conservative audience; neutral would note audience applause and context as personal testimony.

Factual Error

Claims "decades" of expert consensus that spanking is harmful and ineffective, citing AAP, WHO, etc., without noting scientific debate or studies showing trivial/no harms.

Misleads readers into believing unanimous opposition, suppressing evidence of contested research; implies Mullin ignores settled science.

Missing Context

Parental spanking is legal in all 50 US states and was experienced by 37% of children aged 0-17 in the past year per 2014 national survey.

Normalizes Mullin's practice as fringe/abusive when it's legally protected and common, changing perception from outdated outlier to mainstream.

Source Credibility

Stacks quotes from anti-spanking experts/advocates (e.g., WHO's Etienne Krug, Empowering Minds' Fiona Yassin) without disclosing potential agendas or counter-experts.

Manufactures consensus by only citing one side; readers assume broad agreement without seeing debate.

Missing Context

No major right-leaning outlets covered the story, indicating it was not seen as newsworthy beyond left media; Mullin's comments were from a 2023 speech resurfaced in 2026 amid his DHS nomination.

Omits that this is selective outrage amplification, not broad controversy, avoiding impression of widespread scandal.

Framing

Uses loaded headline "Bragging About Doing It" and dwells on child's pleas ("No, Daddy! No!") while truncating Mullin's full anecdote of immediate post-spanking hugs and his daughter turning out well, to applause from audience.

Paints Mullin as cruel/braggart rather than sharing a positive personal story in a supportive conservative setting; neutral framing would include full context of affection and outcomes.

Factual Error

Claims "decades" of expert opposition to spanking as harmful/ineffective, citing AAP/WHO, implying settled consensus.

Obscures ongoing scientific debate where meta-analyses (e.g., Ferguson 2013 r=0.07-0.11; Larzelere 2024 β=0.08 trivial) find small/no causal harms, some benefits for mild spanking.

Source Credibility

Quotes only anti-spanking sources (AAP, WHO's Krug, clinicians Yassin/Puls) without counter-experts or debate disclosure.

Creates false consensus; HuffPost's left bias leads to one-sided stacking against conservative figure.

Missing Context

Spanking by parents is legal in all 50 US states; 37% of US children aged 0-17 experienced it in past year (2014 national survey).

Frames practice as fringe/aberrant when legally protected and common, normalizing Mullin's view.

Missing Context

No coverage in major right-leaning outlets (Fox News, Daily Wire); story amplified only by left media post-DHS nomination.

Presents as broad controversy when selective outrage, inflating significance.

Writing analysis narrative

Analysis narrative ready

Narrative analysis generated

Writing verdict summary

Ratings generated

Investigation complete. Preparing report...

The Compass

You see how this outlet sees the world.

How do you see it? Find your political shape in a few minutes.

Take the test

Or check your own article