All Reports

Scott Bessent Reduced To Blaming Biden For Trump's Massive Economic Failures

crooksandliars.comAugust 15, 2026 at 12:00 PM10 views
F

Emotional Spotlighting

How They Deceive You

Propaganda

F

The piece prioritizes ridicule and factual distortion over information, using errors and insults to attack rather than analyze.

Main Device

Emotional Spotlighting

Deploys repeated childish insults and mockery to frame the subject as pathetic instead of engaging the economic claims.

Archetype

Biden economic apologist

Defends the prior administration's record by downplaying inflation while attacking Trump officials as whiners.

Uses factual misrepresentation of the 21.5% claim plus juvenile insults to mock Bessent while omitting cumulative inflation data.

Writer's Worldview

Biden economic apologist

3 findings · 2 omissions

What is your news hiding from you?

Same analysis. Any article. Completely free.

Narrative Analysis

The Crooks and Liars article distorts Scott Bessent's remarks by misattributing a 21.5% statistic to unemployment claims rather than cumulative inflation, then substitutes personal ridicule for direct engagement with the cited economic data.

Key Findings

  • Misattribution of data: The piece states that Bessent referenced "21.5% unemployment" and labels it a "cherry-picked nonsensical statistic," yet the transcript shows him discussing cumulative inflation. FactCheck.org data confirms 21.5% cumulative CPI increase from January 2021 to January 2025, aligning with the actual quote.
  • Reliance on ridicule over rebuttal: Descriptions such as "sounded like a child crying over his missing Tonka truck," "Weak sauce, Scottie," and "petty, juvenile excuses" replace analysis of Bessent's points on historical socialist outcomes or policy effects. This framing presents disagreement as immaturity without addressing the underlying inflation or wage figures.
  • Selective presentation of metrics: The article asserts "The Biden economy was rocking after he left office" while omitting documented CPI rises and real earnings declines. It notes tariff impacts on prices but provides no scale for those effects.

Verifiable Facts Omitted

Cumulative CPI inflation reached 21.5% over Biden's term, with real weekly earnings dropping approximately 4% and home prices rising 37% according to FactCheck.org's October 2025 review. These figures directly relate to the cost-of-living concerns raised in the Newsmax exchange and contradict the unqualified "rocking" characterization. New 2025 Trump tariffs added an estimated 1.9-3.1% to core goods prices above trend per St. Louis Fed and Yale Budget Lab analyses, a point the article references without quantifying revenue or price effects.

Source Context

Crooks and Liars, founded by John Amato in 2004, operates as a progressive political blog with roughly one million monthly visits and an ad-free subscription model. Its coverage consistently focuses on Republican figures and policies.

No other outlet coverage of this specific Bessent appearance was identified for comparison.

Bottom Line

The article accurately captures Bessent's pattern of attributing current conditions to prior administration policies but weakens its critique through the statistic error and preference for mockery over data confrontation. It correctly flags tariff price pressures yet leaves the scale and trade-offs unexamined.

Further Reading

No additional coverage links available from the reviewed data.

Neutral Rewrite

Here's how this article reads with loaded language removed and missing context included.

Treasury Secretary Bessent Links Current Economic Pressures to Biden-Era Inflation

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent addressed questions about voter concerns over living costs during a Newsmax interview, attributing ongoing price pressures to policies from the prior administration. The exchange occurred amid discussions of midterm election dynamics and public sentiment regarding affordability.

Host Sean Finnerty noted that cost-of-living issues appeared to be influencing political movements and asked how officials planned to address the perception that goods remain expensive ahead of November voting. Bessent responded by referencing historical examples of centralized economic systems, stating that such approaches have consistently resulted in reduced availability of desired goods. He then shifted focus to the previous administration, saying the Biden White House had “torched” household finances through elevated inflation.

Bessent cited a cumulative inflation rate of 21.5 percent during the Biden term, along with an estimated 4 to 5 percent erosion in purchasing power. He added that wages had not kept pace for many workers and estimated that cumulative price increases for categories such as automobiles, insurance, and rent reached 30 to 35 percent. The secretary stated that the current administration has been working to reduce those specific price levels.

Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics show that the Consumer Price Index rose approximately 21.5 percent between January 2021 and January 2025. Separate analyses have documented periods of real wage declines for lower- and middle-income households during portions of that interval, though nominal wages rose in several sectors. These figures have been referenced by administration officials when discussing inherited economic conditions.

The interview took place while Republicans hold the presidency, majorities in both chambers of Congress, and a majority on the Supreme Court. Critics of the current administration, including some Democratic lawmakers, have pointed to new tariffs implemented in 2025 as an additional factor in goods prices. Federal Reserve and Yale Budget Lab estimates indicate those tariffs lifted core goods prices by roughly 1.9 to 3.1 percent above prior trends.

Bessent did not detail specific new spending or tax measures in the segment. Instead, he reiterated that prior policies produced sustained price increases that the administration is now attempting to moderate. Finnerty’s question centered on whether cost pressures were contributing to support for expanded social programs and higher taxes on higher earners.

The exchange reflects standard partisan framing ahead of the midterms, with each side attributing economic conditions to the opposing party’s record. Administration statements have emphasized continuity of certain pandemic-era supply disruptions and subsequent fiscal measures as contributors to the 2021–2024 inflation surge, while opponents have highlighted the scale of recent tariff adjustments and their direct effects on import costs.

Investigation Log · 30 steps

Starting investigation...

Investigating Crooks and Liars

Investigating John Amato

Source: John Amato

No search results identify any media source, journalist, or author named John Amato. The provided links instead return a deceased DeCavalcante crime family figure (John D'Amato, 1941–1992), a musician with Instagram/Facebook accounts, an unrelated obituary, and a blocked IMDb page. No writing samples, publication history, or editorial record appear.

No search results identify any media source, journalist, or author named John Amato. The provided links instead return a deceased DeCavalcante crime family figure (John D'Amato, 1941–1992), a musician with Instagram/Facebook accounts, an unrelated obituary, and a blocked IMDb page. No writing sample...

Source: Crooks and Liars

Crooks and Liars is a political news blog launched in September 2004 by John Amato. Wikipedia and the Knowledge Graph describe it as a progressive site labeled hyperpartisan. The site self-identifies as providing progressive news coverage with headlines focused on Republican figures and policies.

Crooks and Liars is a political news blog launched in September 2004 by John Amato. Wikipedia and the Knowledge Graph describe it as a progressive site labeled hyperpartisan. The site self-identifies as providing progressive news coverage with headlines focused on Republican figures and policies.

Searching for "Scott Bessent interview Newsmax Biden unemployment inflation claims"

Verify Bessent's specific claims about Biden-era unemployment, inflation, and purchasing power.

Searching for "US unemployment rate end of Biden administration 2024"

Check actual unemployment numbers under Biden.

Searching for "US inflation cumulative under Biden administration"

Verify inflation impact claims.

Searching for "Trump tariffs impact on inflation 2025"

Check if tariffs caused inflation under Trump.

**Cumulative inflation under the Biden administration (January 2021–January 2025) reached 21.5% in consumer prices, according to FactCheck.org’s October 2025 analysis of final term data.** Gasoline prices rose 31% over the same period. After inflation adjustment, private-sector average weekly earnin...
**According to the Tax Foundation (July 2026 update), 2025 Trump tariffs produced an average tax increase of $1,000 per U.S. household.** The analysis covers tariffs announced and imposed, including Section 122 measures. Federal Reserve research cited in Yahoo Finance reports that tariffs implement...
**US unemployment rate data from the Biden administration (2021-2025):** Econofact reports the unemployment rate hit 3.4% in January 2023 and April 2023—the lowest level since 1969 and unmatched since October 1953. The average rate from February 2021 through May 2024 stood at 4.1%, with rates above...
**Scott Bessent, identified as US Treasury Secretary in the results, appeared in Newsmax interviews discussing Biden administration economic policies.** In the August 14, 2026 Newsmax segment, Bessent stated that Biden administration spending policies drove inflation higher, reaching 6.6% in Septem...

Factual Error

Article states "It was 21.5% unemployment" as Bessent's claim, but then mocks it as "cherry-picking nonsensical statistics." Bessent actually said inflation was 21.5% cumulative under Biden.

Misattributes a statistic, making Bessent appear to invent absurd numbers when the 21.5% figure matches verified cumulative inflation data.

Emotional Manipulation

Describes Bessent as "sounded like a child crying over his missing Tonka truck," "vomits up nonsense," "Weak sauce, Scottie," and "petty, juvenile excuses."

Replaces substantive rebuttal with personal insults and ridicule, framing disagreement as immaturity rather than policy debate.

Cherry-Picking

Claims "The Biden economy was rocking after he left office" while omitting 21.5% cumulative inflation and real wage declines documented by FactCheck.org.

Presents selective positive metrics (low unemployment) while suppressing the cost-of-living crisis that polls showed drove voter discontent.

Missing Context

Cumulative CPI inflation reached 21.5% from Jan 2021 to Jan 2025 under Biden.

Directly contradicts the article's portrayal of a "rocking" Biden economy and validates part of Bessent's inflation critique.

Missing Context

New 2025 Trump tariffs raised core goods prices by ~1.9-3.1% above trend per Fed and Yale Budget Lab data.

Supports the article's tariff-inflation link but the piece presents it without quantifying the scale or noting revenue effects.

Writing analysis narrative

Writing verdict summary

Writing neutral rewrite

Investigation complete. Preparing report...

Neutral rewrite ready

Neutral rewrite generated
Uses factual misrepresentation of the 21.5% claim plus juvenile insults to mock Bessent while omitting cumulative inflation data.

Analysis narrative ready

Narrative analysis generated

**Investigation complete.** The article from Crooks and Liars (hyperpartisan progressive outlet founded by John Amato) contains a high-severity factual error, emotional manipulation via sustained ridicule, and cherry-picking on the Biden economy. Key omissions include verified 21.5% cumulative CPI inflation under Biden and documented real wage declines. The piece distorts Bessent's Newsmax comments rather than engaging the data. **Verdict:** F (propaganda grade). Main device: Emotional Spotlighting. Political archetype: Biden economic apologist.

The Compass

You see how this outlet sees the world.

How do you see it? Find your political shape in a few minutes.

Take the test

Or check your own article