All Reports

Trump finally orders Navy to return steam catapults in obsession that could cost billions

independent.co.ukAugust 14, 2026 at 12:00 PM36 views
C

Emotional Spotlighting

How They Deceive You

Propaganda

C

Notable spin through loaded language and selective omission that frames a policy dispute as personal irrationality.

Main Device

Emotional Spotlighting

Repeatedly brands Trump's position an 'obsession' and 'bizarre' to evoke irrationality rather than engaging the technical record.

Archetype

Beltway defense establishment skeptic

Views Trump as an erratic outsider meddling with professional military procurement choices.

Labels Trump's EMALS critique an 'obsession' three times while omitting the system's early failures and overruns that prompted it.

Writer's Worldview

Beltway defense establishment skeptic

3 findings

What is your news hiding from you?

Same analysis. Any article. Completely free.

Narrative Analysis

The article accurately reports a Trump administration directive to revert Ford-class carriers from EMALS to steam catapults but frames the decision through repeated language that presents a technical policy disagreement as personal eccentricity.

Key Findings

  • Loaded framing in headline and lead characterizes the directive as an "obsession" rather than a policy choice. The title states "Trump finally orders Navy to return steam catapults in obsession that could cost billions," and the opening sentence calls it "a bizarre obsession for the President in recent years." This approach shifts focus from engineering trade-offs to the president's psychology.
  • Repetition of "obsession" appears three times, converting a position Trump has stated publicly since 2017 into a psychological trait. The piece notes his earlier comments on EMALS lacking power but does not examine the substance of those claims against operational data.
  • Selective presentation of EMALS performance highlights advantages such as higher sortie rates and reduced crew requirements while omitting documented early issues. The article notes the system's "key advantages" without referencing the multi-year delays, cost overruns, and reliability shortfalls reported during USS Ford's initial operational testing.

What Was Missing

The article does not include data on EMALS teething problems on the lead ship, including repeated failures during testing that extended the carrier's post-delivery work and increased costs. These issues were documented in Navy test reports and congressional oversight documents prior to 2026. Their absence leaves readers without context for why a reversion to steam systems was under consideration.

Source and Author Context

Konstantin Toropin is the Pentagon reporter for the Associated Press and previously covered Navy issues for Military.com. He is a U.S. Navy veteran with a background in signals intelligence. No documented political affiliations appear in available records.

Bottom Line

The piece delivers the basic facts of the directive and its potential cost implications. Its framing, however, consistently treats the technical debate over launch system reliability as secondary to the president's personal history with the issue. This narrows the reader's view of the engineering and budgetary questions involved.

Neutral Rewrite

Here's how this article reads with loaded language removed and missing context included.

Trump Directs Navy to Install Steam Catapults on Fourth Ford-Class Carrier

President Donald Trump has directed the Navy to replace the Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System on the fourth Ford-class aircraft carrier with steam-powered catapults. The directive, issued Thursday, also calls for replacing the electromagnetic weapons elevators on the USS Doris Miller.

The memo requires the Pentagon and Navy to submit implementation plans within two months. It applies specifically to the Doris Miller, leaving the USS Gerald R. Ford, USS John F. Kennedy, and USS Enterprise with their existing systems. Redesigning a carrier already under construction for such a change involves substantial engineering work.

Trump has criticized the electromagnetic system since at least 2017. In a Time magazine interview that year, he stated the new system is “not good” and “doesn’t have the power” of steam catapults, adding, “You’re going to goddamned steam.” He has repeated the position at subsequent public events.

The change would affect a system designed to reduce crew requirements and increase launch rates. On the USS Ford, EMALS reduced the number of sailors needed to operate each catapult from roughly a dozen to two. Navy statements in February noted that the Ford achieved higher aircraft launch and recovery rates than Nimitz-class carriers during testing. The system also occupies less deck space.

However, the USS Gerald R. Ford experienced repeated reliability shortfalls with EMALS during initial testing and shakedown cruises. Government Accountability Office reports documented multiple delays in achieving full operational capability, along with higher-than-planned maintenance demands and cost growth tied to the new technology. These issues contributed to extended construction timelines and budget increases for the lead ship.

Steam catapults, used on all Nimitz-class carriers, have a decades-long record of service but require more personnel and dedicated steam generation equipment. The Navy has cited both systems’ trade-offs in congressional testimony over the past decade.

General Atomics, the EMALS manufacturer, stated that work on the Doris Miller’s catapults and arresting gear is already approximately 50 percent complete. The company warned that switching systems at this stage would introduce cost increases, schedule delays, and integration risks. It called for “careful reconsideration” of the decision.

The directive notes that repeated design changes during ship construction have historically produced cost growth and schedule slips. The Navy currently faces approximately 20,000 unfilled billets across the fleet, according to service data released earlier this year.

China’s newest aircraft carriers use electromagnetic catapults. France has announced plans to adopt the technology for its next carrier. The United States remains the only operator of the specific General Atomics EMALS variant installed on the Ford class.

Funding for the change would be addressed in future budget requests. The administration has proposed a $1.5 trillion defense budget and is seeking a $95 billion supplemental package that includes funding related to operations in Iran, which Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth estimated last month at $37.5 billion. The House has passed elements of the package; the Senate is scheduled to consider them in September.

The memo does not direct retrofits to the three earlier Ford-class hulls. Any conversion of the Doris Miller would require new steam plant design work, piping modifications, and adjustments to the flight deck layout already under contract.

Investigation Log · 26 steps

Starting investigation...

Investigating The Independent

Investigating Konstantin Toropin

Source: The Independent

The Independent is a British online newspaper (nicknamed the Indy) that began as a national morning print paper in 1986. The provided search results contain no fact-check track records, accuracy ratings, or documented corrections. No ownership, funding, or performance data is available.

The Independent is a British online newspaper (nicknamed the Indy) that began as a national morning print paper in 1986. The provided search results contain no fact-check track records, accuracy ratings, or documented corrections. No ownership, funding, or performance data is available.

Source: Konstantin Toropin

Konstantin Toropin is the Pentagon reporter for the Associated Press, previously serving as Pentagon correspondent and Navy specialist at Military.com (2021–2025) and covering national news for CNN. He holds a B.A. in Journalism and Political Science from Penn State and a master’s in Mass Communication from the University of Minnesota. He is a U.S. Navy veteran who served five years as a signals intelligence analyst.

Konstantin Toropin is the Pentagon reporter for the Associated Press, previously serving as Pentagon correspondent and Navy specialist at Military.com (2021–2025) and covering national news for CNN. He holds a B.A. in Journalism and Political Science from Penn State and a master’s in Mass Communicat...

Searching for "Trump orders Navy return to steam catapults EMALS 2026"

Verify if Trump issued directive to revert Ford-class carriers to steam catapults

Searching for ""Donald Trump" "steam catapults" OR EMALS directive OR memo Navy"

Find primary sources or official reports on the order

Searching for "EMALS vs steam catapults advantages disadvantages Navy Ford class"

Verify technical claims about performance, maintenance, and sailor requirements

**No relevant information found.** The provided search results consist exclusively of general biographical and official profile pages on Donald Trump (Wikipedia entry, whitehouse.gov administration page, archived Trump White House site, and Facebook profile). These pages detail his business career,...
**EMALS (Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System) on the USS Gerald R. Ford (lead ship of the Ford-class carriers, installed c. 2015) uses a linear induction motor rather than a steam piston.** Wikipedia states its primary documented advantage is smoother acceleration that puts less stress on aircr...
**President Trump signed a national security memorandum on August 13, 2026, directing the U.S. Navy to replace the electromagnetic aircraft launch system (EMALS) on Ford-class aircraft carriers with steam catapults and hydraulic systems.** The order applies to future carriers, including the Doris M...

Framing

Title and lead use "bizarre obsession" and "finally orders... in obsession" to characterize Trump's policy preference as irrational fixation rather than a substantive technical disagreement.

This primes readers to view the decision as personality-driven rather than policy-driven, undermining legitimate debate over EMALS reliability and cost.

Emotional Manipulation

Repeated use of "obsession" (three times) and "bizarre" to describe Trump's consistent criticism of EMALS since 2017.

Converts a long-held, publicly stated technical preference into a psychological flaw, discouraging evaluation of the underlying engineering arguments.

Omission

Mentions EMALS advantages (fewer sailors, higher sortie rate) but omits documented early reliability problems, delays, and cost overruns on USS Ford that fueled Trump's criticism.

Presents EMALS as unambiguously superior without acknowledging why the Navy and Trump questioned it.

Writing analysis narrative

Writing verdict summary

Writing neutral rewrite

Investigation complete. Preparing report...

Labels Trump's EMALS critique an 'obsession' three times while omitting the system's early failures and overruns that prompted it.

Analysis narrative ready

Narrative analysis generated

Neutral rewrite ready

Neutral rewrite generated

**Investigation complete.** The article reports a verifiable Trump directive (August 2026 national security memorandum directing EMALS removal on future Ford-class carriers, starting with USS Doris Miller) but frames the policy choice as personal eccentricity. **Key findings recorded:** - Repeated use of "obsession" and "bizarre" to characterize a long-standing technical critique. - Selective presentation of EMALS advantages while omitting documented early reliability issues, delays, and cost overruns on USS Ford that justified the reversal. - Title and lead embed the conclusion that the move is irrational rather than debatable. **Verdict:** C (moderate framing bias). The core facts hold; the presentation converts a legitimate engineering dispute into a personality story. No factual errors found in the reported events.

The Compass

You see how this outlet sees the world.

How do you see it? Find your political shape in a few minutes.

Take the test

Or check your own article