Iran War Sends US Oil and Gas Prices Higher, Straining Farmers

Iran War Sends US Oil and Gas Prices Higher, Straining Farmers

Cover image from salon.com, which was analyzed for this article

High gas prices from Iran war push farmers to the brink and accelerate inflation, roiling bond markets. Officials like Kudlow tell Americans to 'live with it' as a small price for security. Oil rises over 1% post-summit amid unresolved tensions.

PoliticalOS

Friday, May 15, 2026Business

3 min read

The Iran conflict has produced measurable spikes in US fuel and fertilizer costs that are squeezing farmers and lifting pump prices, yet the scale and duration of those effects remain tied to unverified shipping and supply figures. Diplomacy after the Trump-Xi summit has produced only partial alignment on keeping the Strait of Hormuz open, leaving markets and producers exposed to continued volatility.

What outlets missed

Most coverage omitted the documented sequence of exhausted diplomacy and Iranian nuclear advances that preceded the February 28 strikes, leaving readers without context on whether the conflict was initiated or reactive. Few pieces reconciled conflicting tanker counts through Hormuz or noted that traffic had already recovered to about 30 permitted passages by mid-May. The absence of verified data on China’s exact share of Iranian oil purchases before the war also left claims about Beijing’s leverage untested across outlets.

Reading:·····

Iran War Drags On as American Farmers Face Soaring Costs and Empty Promises

American farmers are absorbing the first real blows from the ongoing conflict with Iran, with fuel and fertilizer prices climbing sharply since the strikes began in late February. In Iowa, third-generation grower Alan Montag watched input costs jump well beyond last spring's levels while planting soybeans near West Bend. Similar pressures hit North Carolina's Bertie County, where ninth-generation farmer Charles Harden reports a twelve-inch rain deficit already this year and says the current stretch ranks as the toughest he has seen for agriculture in his lifetime.

The spike traces directly to oil market turmoil tied to the Strait of Hormuz. Brent crude futures climbed above 108 dollars a barrel and West Texas Intermediate topped 103 dollars after President Trump left Beijing without a concrete plan to reopen the waterway. Chinese officials agreed in principle that the strait should stay open and free of tolls, yet no timeline emerged for restoring normal tanker traffic. Thirty vessels have crossed since Wednesday, far below the pre-war average of roughly 140 per day, and Iranian forces continue to seize ships in the region.

The administration's public line downplays the burden on ordinary Americans. Fox Business host Larry Kudlow told viewers that four-dollar-fifty to five-dollar gasoline amounts to a small price for removing Iran's nuclear threat and pursuing regime change. He added that Americans should simply live with it until the fighting ends. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent echoed that China would work quietly to ease the shipping bottleneck because it serves Beijing's own interests. Those statements landed amid reports that the Chinese side still seeks to purchase American crude from Texas, Louisiana, and Alaska, a development the White House highlighted after the summit.

Yet the diplomatic results remain thin. Trump described the Beijing meetings as productive on several fronts and noted shared opposition to an Iranian nuclear weapon, but he also posted afterward that the military campaign against Iran could continue. Markets responded with fresh gains in energy prices, reinforcing the very cost pressures now hitting diesel tanks and anhydrous ammonia bills on Midwest and Southern farms.

Farmers like Harden point out that their operations already operate on narrow margins. Drought conditions compound the expense of every extra dollar spent on fuel to run irrigation pumps or dryers. Equipment dealers report slower sales as operators delay purchases, and lenders have grown more cautious about extending operating lines. The pattern echoes earlier disruptions when global energy shocks rippled through domestic agriculture, except this time the trigger sits squarely in U.S. foreign policy choices.

Washington voices continue to frame the campaign as essential for long-term security. Critics on the ground counter that the immediate ledger shows higher costs for fuel, food transport, and chemical inputs with no visible off-ramp. Until tanker traffic normalizes and fertilizer plants regain steady feedstock, those pressures will keep building in counties far from the Persian Gulf.

You just read America First's take. Want to read what actually happened?