Stocks Rebound as Oil Hits $95 on Iran Tensions

Marc Rowan, the chief executive of Apollo Global Management, has directed $1.5 million this year to the United Democracy Project, a super PAC aligned with the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. Federal Election Commission records show the first installment of $1 million arrived in March, followed by $500,000 in July. Those contributions coincide with stepped-up spending by the group against candidates who have criticized unconditional U.S. support for Israel.

Rowan’s donations form part of a larger pattern in which major donors use super PACs to shape primary contests. The United Democracy Project has already deployed nearly $50,000 in mailers in Michigan targeting Abdul El-Sayed, a progressive Senate candidate who has called for conditioning military aid to Israel. Additional funds went toward phone banking in Missouri aimed at former Representative Cori Bush. Earlier this year the same committee spent heavily against Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky, a Republican who has repeatedly voted against supplemental assistance packages for Israel.

Rowan’s involvement extends beyond campaign finance. He serves on the “Board of Peace,” a body authorized by the United Nations to oversee aspects of President Trump’s plan for postwar Gaza. At a February meeting of the group, Rowan described the territory’s reconstruction prospects in commercial terms, noting that the obstacles were political rather than financial. Critics have pointed out that Palestinians hold no formal role in selecting members of the board, and that the arrangement places an American investor with significant stakes in Middle East policy in a position to influence both reconstruction contracts and domestic political spending.

The scale of these contributions reflects the current structure of federal campaign finance. Super PACs can accept unlimited sums from individuals and spend them independently of candidates, provided they do not coordinate directly. AIPAC-affiliated committees have used this channel to move tens of millions of dollars in recent cycles, concentrating on Democratic primaries where challengers have questioned the level of U.S. military assistance. Data from the Center for Responsive Politics indicate that outside spending by such groups has risen sharply since 2022, coinciding with heightened attention to the Gaza conflict inside the Democratic electorate.

Rowan’s profile also illustrates the concentration of wealth among a small number of donors. With a net worth reported above $8 billion, his contributions represent a modest fraction of his resources yet can exceed the annual budgets of many smaller campaigns. Public records further show that he once consulted with Jeffrey Epstein on business matters, a detail that has drawn renewed scrutiny as his political role expands.

The broader effect on congressional debates remains incremental. Candidates who prevail despite or because of this spending still operate within a legislative environment where bipartisan majorities have sustained military aid packages. At the same time, the visibility of donor activity has prompted some Democratic strategists to recalculate the risks of adopting more conditional positions on Israel policy. Whether sustained outside spending can continue to offset shifts in voter sentiment among younger and nonwhite Democrats will be tested in upcoming primaries and the 2026 midterms.