Voters Wary of AI and Crypto as Industry PACs Flood Midterms
Cover image from thebulwark.com, which was analyzed for this article
Democrats and Republicans are united in concerns about AI, with polls showing public unease despite heavy midterm spending on tech and crypto. Warnings grow that AI could further erode democracy after social media.
PoliticalOS
Sunday, May 3, 2026 — Tech
Widespread public skepticism toward AI and crypto, centered on job losses, democratic risks and special-interest dominance, stands in sharp contrast to the record sums these industries are spending to shape the 2026 midterms. Despite courting candidates in both parties and pushing for uniform federal rules, the industries face the real possibility that financial influence will collide with voter distrust rather than overcome it. The most important reality is that past experience with social media has primed many Americans to view the next wave of technology with caution, making regulatory outcomes far from certain.
What outlets missed
Both outlets underplayed the IRS's documented AI expansion from 10 applications in 2022 to 126 currently deployed, alongside the specific GAO findings on management shortfalls, skills gaps and impending 25% workforce reductions that paint a more nuanced picture of implementation challenges rather than unqualified wins or unmitigated risks. Coverage also gave short shrift to rising real-world AI adoption, such as Quinnipiac data showing 51% of Americans using it for research, which sits alongside expressed skepticism and suggests the unease may be more abstract than absolute. The full scale of crypto PAC reserves, reported elsewhere as approaching $190 million entering the cycle, received only partial treatment, as did the explicit industry goal of securing federal preemption over state AI laws to avoid regulatory fragmentation. Finally, neither fully integrated how Operation Warp Speed's AI-adjacent tools were tied more closely to platforms like Palantir than to the core vaccine initiative itself, an unverified detail in promotional contexts that deserved clearer sourcing.
You've seen the spin. Now read what happened.
The unbiased version strips away everything the other four added: the framing, the omissions, the selective emphasis. Just what happened.
Read all five, free for 7 days$4.99/mo after trial. Cancel anytime.