Hegseth Launches Six-Month Review of U.S. Forces in Europe

Hegseth Launches Six-Month Review of U.S. Forces in Europe

Cover image from newsmax.com, which was analyzed for this article

Defense Secretary Hegseth announced a six-month review of US forces in Europe and criticized NATO allies for insufficient defense spending. The move signals potential shifts in American military commitments abroad.

PoliticalOS

Thursday, June 18, 2026Politics

3 min read

The United States is conditioning future force levels in Europe on measurable increases in allied spending and operational support. European allies have raised outlays but face an explicit six-month test whose outcome could alter long-standing U.S. commitments.

What outlets missed

Most reports omitted that the United States has already reduced its assigned contributions to NATO crisis forces effective immediately, not merely announced a future review. Few detailed the Nuclear Planning Group’s first statement in 19 years or the administration’s explicit goal of reallocating assets for potential simultaneous conflicts with China. Coverage rarely named specific countries that denied basing or overflight during Iran-related operations, leaving the scale of the dispute unquantified. The 5 percent GDP spending target and its 3.5 percent core-defense component received inconsistent emphasis across outlets.

Reading:·····

The United States signaled it may scale back its military footprint in Europe unless allies accelerate their own defense efforts. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told NATO ministers in Brussels on June 18 that a Pentagon review of American force posture and basing would last up to six months and would judge whether European nations are assuming primary responsibility for the continent’s security.

Hegseth described the process as one that “some countries will fail, and others will pass with flying colors.” He said the review aims to move NATO “fast and irreversibly toward Europe leading” and cited recent refusals by some allies to grant base access or overflight for operations related to the Iran conflict. Those decisions, he stated, placed U.S. personnel “at risk by denying them the predictable access, basing and overflight that never should have been in question at all.”

NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte noted that the United States has already lowered its contributions to the alliance’s crisis-response forces. European allies and Canada increased defense spending by $90 billion last year, a 20 percent rise, yet the Trump administration is pressing for a new minimum of 5 percent of GDP, with 3.5 percent for core defense. Hegseth referred to the effort as the “NATO 3.0 review,” involving input from U.S. European Command and Congress.

The Nuclear Planning Group issued its first statement in 19 years, reaffirming strategic nuclear forces as the alliance’s supreme guarantee. Under Article 5, an attack on one member is considered an attack on all, though the treaty does not mandate specific military support. The United States retains the largest forces in the alliance and has no plans to withdraw its nuclear weapons from Europe.

The Compass

You just read five takes on one story.

What's your take? Find your political shape in a few minutes.

Take the test