Federal Agents Search Omar Home in Ongoing Immigration Probe

Federal agents from Homeland Security Investigations carried out a court authorized search of Representative Ilhan Omar's Washington residence early Monday as part of a criminal investigation into immigration fraud. The Justice Department confirmed the action but offered no further details at the time, noting only that Congress was out of session and the probe remains active. Sources familiar with the inquiry told multiple outlets that agents are examining paperwork submitted by Omar's late father when she arrived in the United States as a child from Somalia in the early 1990s.

Omar, a Minnesota Democrat who has frequently criticized President Trump, described the search on social media as an escalation of political targeting. She said she would not be silenced and accused the administration of weaponizing federal law enforcement against opponents. Her communications director called the raid an abuse of power. In public remarks, Trump said he had no direct involvement in the Justice Department matter and referred to Omar as a persistent complainer who came from what he called a failed state. At a rally in Ohio he repeated criticisms of Somali immigration and drew chants of deportation from supporters.

The episode arrives amid longstanding questions about Omar's family immigration history and separate scrutiny of Minnesota programs that have been tied to large scale fraud. Public records reviewed by outlets show that Omar's sister, Sahra Noor, incorporated a consulting firm at an address also linked to individuals later convicted in the Feeding Our Future scandal, one of the largest public theft cases in state history. A state legislative committee has sought records from Omar on related matters, though Democratic majorities blocked an earlier subpoena attempt. Omar has not been charged in connection with any of those investigations.

The raid has produced sharply different reactions along party lines. Democrats have framed it as selective enforcement aimed at a prominent critic, drawing contrasts with their earlier defenses of aggressive federal actions against Trump. Republicans have pointed to the same episode as evidence that prior norms against investigating sitting members of Congress were selectively applied. Both sides have cited the principle that no one is above the law while disagreeing on whether that principle is being evenly upheld.

At its core the case tests how federal agencies handle immigration related allegations when they involve elected officials whose families entered the country decades earlier. The paperwork in question dates to a period when refugee processing for Somalis was expanding rapidly, and records from that era have sometimes proved incomplete or inconsistent under later review. Whether the current investigation yields charges or simply exhausts available evidence will determine how much it alters the broader debate over enforcement priorities and institutional trust.