Trump Rally Remark on Iran Sparks Newsom 25th Amendment Call

Trump Rally Remark on Iran Sparks Newsom 25th Amendment Call

Cover image from time.com, which was analyzed for this article

President Trump suggested Iran could target California cities, drawing sharp criticism from Democrats including Gov. Newsom who called for the 25th Amendment. The White House defended the comments as the midterm campaign intensifies.

PoliticalOS

Wednesday, October 7, 2026 — Politics

3 min read

The remarks occurred during a campaign rally addressing war costs and were defended by the White House as a hypothetical contrast with nuclear deterrence. Democratic leaders in California treated the language as an active threat and renewed calls for the 25th Amendment. The episode leaves unresolved whether such rhetoric during an active conflict strengthens or undermines public confidence in leadership.

What outlets missed

Most coverage omitted the full preceding sentence in which Trump framed the cities line as part of the avoided cost of a nuclear Iran. Few outlets detailed the war's February 2026 start date or Trump's earlier pledge to end it within weeks. Reactions from Republican candidates in California who criticized the rhetoric received minimal attention compared with Democratic statements. The procedural requirements of the 25th Amendment were rarely explained beyond brief mentions. Claims that the remarks put specific military personnel at risk could not be independently verified by other sources.

Reading:·····

Newsom Demands Trump Be Removed From Office Over Iran Remarks Targeting California Cities

California Gov. Gavin Newsom called for President Donald Trump to be stripped of power under the 25th Amendment on Tuesday after the president suggested at a Nebraska rally that Iran could strike Los Angeles or San Diego as an acceptable cost of the ongoing war. Newsom labeled Trump mentally ill and described the comments as dangerous if not treasonous, directing the state’s threat assessment center to monitor for any foreign actors who might interpret the remarks as an invitation to attack.

Trump made the remarks while defending the economic burdens of the conflict he launched against Iran earlier this year. He told supporters that high fuel prices represented a small price to pay for national security and added that Iran taking out a major U.S. city would be tolerable. “Let them take out Los Angeles. Let them take out San Diego,” he said. The audience applauded. The president has repeatedly promised voters the war would conclude quickly, yet it has dragged on past midterm elections with no clear off-ramp in sight.

Newsom’s response was immediate and pointed. In statements to multiple outlets he declared Trump unfit and wrote on social media that the president had placed a target on two of the state’s largest cities and a key naval hub. He ordered heightened vigilance at the state emergency operations center in case adversaries viewed the comments as a green light. California Sen. Alex Padilla echoed the call, posting that the 25th Amendment should be invoked without delay. Section 4 of the amendment allows the vice president and a majority of the Cabinet to determine that a president is unable to discharge the duties of the office.

The remarks come amid mounting Democratic frustration with Trump’s handling of the Iran conflict. Critics note that the president initially vowed a swift resolution yet has continued operations that have driven up costs for American families. Newsom has invoked the 25th Amendment before when criticizing Trump’s rhetoric, arguing that expressions of willingness to accept mass civilian casualties on either side reveal a fundamental incapacity to lead. Tuesday’s escalation drew quick support from other California Democrats who described the comments as reckless and destabilizing at a moment of already heightened international tension.

White House officials attempted to reframe the president’s words, claiming he was merely noting that a nuclear-armed Iran would have posed even greater threats to American cities. Trump himself offered no substantive clarification when approached by reporters the next day, waving off a question about the Los Angeles and San Diego remarks and moving on to unrelated topics. Some conservative commentators defended the statement as rhetorical emphasis, while others on cable news expressed alarm at the casual suggestion that U.S. population centers could be sacrificed.

The episode has intensified an already bitter feud between Newsom and Trump. The governor has positioned himself as a leading voice warning that the president’s pattern of inflammatory language risks real-world consequences. By directing state resources to assess potential threats, Newsom signaled that he takes the possibility of misinterpretation seriously. For critics who have long questioned Trump’s fitness, the rally comments provided fresh evidence that the commander in chief is detached from the gravity of his position. For supporters, the reaction from Democrats amounted to another overreach in a long-running political battle. The war itself remains unresolved, with prices elevated and no end date in sight.

You just read Progressive's take. Want to read what actually happened?

The Compass

You just read five takes on one story.

What's your take? Find your political shape in a few minutes.

Take the test