Data Centers Face Bipartisan Pushback Over Power and Water Costs
Cover image from newrepublic.com, which was analyzed for this article
Republicans and communities push back against data center expansion tied to AI growth, citing power demands and water use even as Trump promotes the projects. NDAs and local opposition are rising.
PoliticalOS
Thursday, August 27, 2026 — Tech
Local resistance to data centers stems from verifiable pressures on power grids and water supplies plus limited transparency via NDAs, even as projects deliver construction jobs and tax revenue in some counties. National leaders remain divided on whether to accelerate or constrain the build-out ahead of the midterms.
What outlets missed
Most coverage omitted that data centers have produced measurable tax windfalls in specific counties, such as $1.3 billion in Loudoun, Virginia, and teacher bonuses in Louisiana districts. Few outlets examined the voluntary ratepayer protection pledge’s compliance record or compared it to prior industry pledges. Details on actual water volumes drawn under closed-loop systems versus older facilities were absent, leaving resident concerns unbenchmarked against engineering data. The split between construction-phase jobs (often 1,000-plus) and permanent operations staff (often under 200) received inconsistent quantification across reports.
Residents across rural and suburban counties now confront higher electricity rates and strained water supplies as data centers multiply to support AI systems. In Louisiana’s Rapides Parish, a $3.6 billion Applied Digital campus will draw 300 megawatts—enough for roughly 200,000 homes—while construction proceeds under nondisclosure agreements signed by local officials. Similar projects have triggered primary defeats for Republican legislators in Utah and local ousters in Virginia and Maryland, where voters rejected officials who backed large tax breaks.
Power demand drives the friction. Texas grid operator ERCOT has received requests for 474 gigawatts of new connections, with about 90 percent tied to data centers; Gov. Greg Abbott paused new grid links while Attorney General Ken Paxton proposed federal rules blocking Chinese equipment and holding operators liable for AI chatbot harms. President Trump has countered that communities should welcome the facilities for construction jobs and tax revenue, noting in recent remarks that turning them away leaves places “left behind.” A voluntary White House ratepayer protection pledge asks companies to build on-site generation, yet carries no enforcement.
Polling shows the breadth of concern. An Economist/YouGov survey found 61 percent of Americans oppose a data center in their community, including 47 percent of Republicans; a Pew poll recorded 71 percent expecting AI to reduce U.S. jobs. In Virginia’s Loudoun County, data centers have generated $1.3 billion in tax revenue even after property-tax cuts, while one Louisiana school district used Meta-related payments for $50,000 teacher bonuses. Water use remains a separate flashpoint: closed-loop cooling systems reduce consumption at some sites, but residents in multiple states still report unverified drawdown risks.
NDAs have limited early scrutiny. Records requests in Louisiana revealed at least 54 such agreements since early 2024, including code-named “Project Lightning.” Experts note the practice appeared in at least 25 of 31 Virginia projects examined last year. One parish president declined NDAs entirely, posting all land, tax, and utility agreements online. Environmental reviews for the Louisiana site were completed but not released publicly, prompting boos at a June town hall.
State responses vary. New York imposed the first statewide moratorium citing utility and resource strain. Multiple legislatures are weighing repeal of tax exemptions. Federal proposals include new environmental reviews and taxes to offset local costs. No comprehensive national count of completed projects or measured rate impacts yet exists across utility filings.
More in Technology
Judge Blocks Pentagon Blacklisting of Anthropic as Illegal Retaliation
A federal judge struck down Pentagon actions against the AI firm as baseless retaliation for criticism of Defense Department AI policies. The ruling protects the company's government dealings.
Meta Settles Teen Addiction Claims for Up to $18 Billion
Meta agreed to a massive multistate settlement over social media addiction and teen safety, imposing new app limits and safeguards. The deal ties payments to competitor actions.
Data Center Backlash Emerges as Bipartisan Midterm Flashpoint
Local opposition to data center energy use and noise is emerging as a bipartisan midterm issue. Companies and candidates face pressure over land and power costs.
Meta Settles Teen Lawsuit With App Limits, No Admission
Meta agreed to a multibillion-dollar settlement with states over child social media harms, including time limits, age verification, and parental controls without admitting wrongdoing. The deal signals potential shifts in Big Tech accountability.
The Compass
You just read five takes on one story.
What's your take? Find your political shape in a few minutes.
Take the test