House Panel Advances Permanent Daylight Saving Time Bill

House Panel Advances Permanent Daylight Saving Time Bill

Cover image from independent.co.uk, which was analyzed for this article

Congress advanced legislation to end twice-yearly clock changes, with President Trump voicing strong support for making daylight saving time permanent. The measure has bipartisan backing in some quarters.

PoliticalOS

Friday, May 22, 2026Politics

3 min read

The House committee has moved a bill that would end biannual clock changes by making daylight saving time permanent, yet the measure still faces full congressional votes and divides opinion over winter sunrises. Public desire to stop switching clocks is clear, but the preferred replacement remains contested.

What outlets missed

Most coverage omitted the specific AP-NORC poll margins showing 56 percent favor permanent daylight saving time versus 42 percent for standard time. Few noted that 19 states have already enacted conditional laws for year-round daylight saving time or that health studies favor permanent standard time on safety grounds. Outlets also underplayed the bill’s attachment to the Motor Vehicle Modernization Act and the exact bipartisan cosponsor counts in both chambers.

Reading:·····

Trump Leads Charge to End Annual Clock Switching Hassle

President Donald Trump threw his support behind legislation that would end the twice-yearly ritual of changing clocks, as a House committee advanced a measure to lock in daylight saving time year round. The move comes after years of public frustration with the disruptions and costs tied to springing forward and falling back.

The House Energy and Commerce Committee approved the Sunshine Protection Act by a 48 to 1 vote on Thursday. Lawmakers folded the proposal into a larger five year transportation bill. If it clears the full House and Senate, the change would keep clocks set to daylight saving time permanently, eliminating the need for adjustments that many Americans view as pointless and expensive.

Trump highlighted the vote in a Truth Social post. He noted that hundreds of millions of dollars are spent each year by individuals, cities, and states just to reset clocks, some of which sit in towers requiring heavy equipment. The president called the biannual process ridiculous and said it was time for people to stop worrying about the clock altogether. He framed the permanent shift as a win for the Republican Party and a straightforward improvement that delivers longer evenings without any obvious downside.

Representative Vern Buchanan, a Florida Republican who has pushed similar bills since 2018, sponsored the latest version. His office pointed out that the measure includes an opt out for states that prefer standard time. Buchanan has described the reform as commonsense, arguing it would improve daily life for millions by removing an unnecessary burden.

Supporters say the current system leads to sleep problems, more workplace accidents, and higher rates of car crashes around the time changes. They add that brighter evenings in winter months could boost evening shopping, recreation, and other economic activity. In Florida the idea draws strong backing because it would extend daylight for golf courses, sports fields, and outdoor activities that matter to residents.

Not everyone agrees. Senator Tom Cotton and a handful of others have raised concerns that permanent daylight saving time would mean later sunrises in winter. In northern parts of the country this could leave children walking to school in the dark for weeks or months. Critics argue that such a shift prioritizes evening light over morning safety and natural rhythms.

The proposal revives an idea that has floated in Congress for years. The Senate passed a similar bill unanimously in 2022, but it never received a House vote. This time the measure appears to have more momentum, especially with Trump publicly urging action and calling the change popular and easy to support.

Public reaction online and in past polls has often shown widespread irritation with the clock changes. Many people simply want one consistent time rather than twice annual reminders that government rules still dictate small details of daily routines. The current process forces adjustments on everything from medical devices to school schedules, and the costs add up when cities must hire crews for public clocks.

If the bill becomes law it would mark a rare case of Congress addressing a long standing complaint without adding new regulations or spending programs. Trump has indicated he would work hard to see it signed, positioning the outcome as a practical victory over bureaucratic habit. The next steps involve full House consideration and then Senate review, where the same arguments about morning darkness will likely surface again.

For now the committee action signals renewed interest in ending a practice that has outlived its original purpose for most Americans. The debate centers less on partisan lines and more on whether the country should finally choose one time and stick with it.

You just read America First's take. Want to read what actually happened?