Judge Voids Trump $100,000 H-1B Visa Fee as Unlawful Tax

Cover image from time.com, which was analyzed for this article
A federal judge blocked the Trump administration's proposed $100,000 fee on new H-1B visas, easing concerns for employers and foreign workers.
PoliticalOS
Tuesday, June 9, 2026 — Politics
The core dispute is whether the executive branch can impose what the court deemed a tax on visa petitions without Congress. The ruling restores prior fee levels while the administration pursues appeal and conflicting decisions move through other circuits.
What outlets missed
Most coverage omitted the administration’s mid-policy carve-outs for physicians and medical residents after hospitals warned of staffing crises. Few noted the December shift from the H-1B lottery to a weighted selection system favoring higher salaries, a change that remains in effect. Outlets also underplayed the precise timeline of the conflicting D.C. ruling that upheld the fee and the September 2026 expiration date still facing appeal. The low collection total of 85 payments received limited emphasis outside wire copy.
Employers seeking to hire foreign workers in specialized roles now face restored access to the H-1B program after a federal judge in Boston struck down a $100,000 application fee imposed last September. The ruling removes a barrier that had prompted some companies to pause hiring and withdraw offers while creating uncertainty for thousands of prospective visa holders in technology, healthcare, and education.
U.S. District Judge Leo Sorokin ruled that the fee functioned as a tax rather than a penalty and therefore required congressional authorization the Trump administration never obtained. Sorokin cited the Supreme Court’s February decision invalidating Trump’s reciprocal tariffs on similar constitutional grounds. The policy had raised fees from the prior range of $2,000 to $5,000 and applied only to new petitions; just 85 payments had been collected by mid-February.
Twenty states led by New York and California filed the Boston lawsuit in December. New York Attorney General Letitia James said the decision ended an illegal attempt to dismantle the program. California Attorney General Rob Bonta called the fee an attack on the ability to attract high-skilled talent. The American Medical Association described the outcome as a victory for patients in underserved areas. A White House statement maintained that the president possesses clear authority under the Immigration and Nationality Act to restrict entry detrimental to U.S. interests and announced plans to appeal.
The Department of Homeland Security called the ruling judicial activism. A separate federal judge in Washington, D.C., had previously upheld a nearly identical fee, leaving that case on appeal. Additional challenges remain pending in California from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, healthcare groups, and labor organizations. The administration had begun granting exemptions for doctors and medical residents after complaints from hospitals and had replaced the visa lottery with a weighted system favoring higher-paid positions.
More in Politics

Category 2 Hurricane Isaias threatens Gulf Coast surge and flooding
Category 2 storm threatens life-threatening surge and flooding along Alabama-Florida coast. National Guard deployed as residents prepare.

ICE Agent Shoots Man in Bronx Car With Child in Backseat
Federal officer shot suspect in vehicle with child present, sparking protests. Mayor Mamdani condemns incident and demands halt to ICE actions.

Tennessee inmate survives lethal injection, raising execution questions
Death-row inmate Christa Pike survived a failed lethal injection in Tennessee, awakening angry and confused after multiple pentobarbital doses. The case has sparked legal battles over evidence preservation and execution methods, covered across left-leaning and right-leaning outlets.

Trump Rally Remark on Iran Sparks Newsom 25th Amendment Call
President Trump suggested Iran could target California cities, drawing sharp criticism from Democrats including Gov. Newsom who called for the 25th Amendment. The White House defended the comments as the midterm campaign intensifies.
The Compass
You just read five takes on one story.
What's your take? Find your political shape in a few minutes.
Take the test