Liberal US Mayors Join European Pact to Counter National Governments

Liberal US Mayors Join European Pact to Counter National Governments

Cover image from npr.org, which was analyzed for this article

Ten progressive US mayors including those from Chicago and Cincinnati are teaming up with European leaders to defend democratic values. The effort comes amid domestic concerns over executive power and progressive priorities.

PoliticalOS

Thursday, May 21, 2026Politics

3 min read

The Pact of Free Cities now links ten US liberal mayors with European counterparts to share tactics on local governance disputes with national authorities. Participants cite funding pressures and policy clashes over issues such as DEI programs and public events. Opposing voices argue the effort diverts attention from immediate local challenges like crime and homelessness.

What outlets missed

Coverage did not include specific figures on the amount of federal funding at stake in the cited disputes or measurable outcomes of the DEI policies involved. No data appeared on crime rates or homelessness statistics in the participating US cities. The timeline of Orbán's electoral defeat and the precise vote margins that ended his 16-year tenure received no independent verification from other sources. Reactions from mayors in non-participating US cities or from European national governments were absent.

Reading:·····

HHS Withholds Details on Anti-Vaccine Activist David Geier Role at Agency

The Department of Health and Human Services continues to shield the public from basic information about the work of longtime anti-vaccine activist David Geier inside the agency. Weeks after Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. pledged to Senate Democrats that he would share details of Geier contract, no documents have arrived and no explanation has been offered for the delay.

Senator Ben Ray Luján office reported that three weeks have passed since Kennedy promised the material within three days. A spokesperson for the New Mexico Democrat said the office has received nothing related to Geier employment or assignments. The silence has drawn fresh scrutiny from autism advocacy groups that have long described Geier as unqualified to shape federal health policy.

Geier and his late father Mark operated for years from a Maryland home where they promoted discredited theories linking vaccines to autism. Their organizations carried formal-sounding titles such as the Institute for Chronic Illness and the Genetic Centers of America, yet their published claims were repeatedly rejected by mainstream medical bodies. A 2003 review by the American Academy of Pediatrics faulted one of their studies for conceptual flaws, factual omissions and misstatements about thimerosal.

Mark Geier eventually lost his medical license after state boards found he had improperly treated autistic children with Lupron, a powerful drug used to chemically castrate sex offenders. The pair recommended the hormone suppressant despite lacking evidence it improved autism symptoms and despite known risks to developing bodies. David Geier carried on similar work after his father death, continuing to appear in legal and media settings as an expert on alleged vaccine injuries.

Kennedy appointment of Geier to an HHS position has alarmed public-health experts who note the department current responsibilities include vaccine safety monitoring and immunization programs. The agency has offered only vague assurances that Geier is providing research support, without naming projects or supervisors. Lawmakers on the Senate Finance Committee have pressed for the contract language and scope of work, yet the promised materials remain undelivered.

Advocates argue that placing an individual with Geier record in any policy-influencing role risks undermining years of evidence-based vaccine recommendations. They point to declining routine immunization rates in several states and rising outbreaks of measles and whooping cough as reasons for heightened caution. Without a clear description of Geier duties, they say, parents and physicians cannot assess whether federal guidance remains grounded in rigorous science.

HHS has not responded to repeated requests for clarification on Geier status. The prolonged lack of transparency comes as the agency faces broader questions about how it will handle vaccine-related communications under the current administration. For now, the public record shows only that Geier is on the payroll and that officials are unwilling to say what he is doing.

You just read Progressive's take. Want to read what actually happened?